Skip to main content
  • About
  • Reviews
  • Magazines
  • Interviews
  • Tips
  • Classifieds

SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER

ENTER CONTEST!.

Search

publishing tips

Yes, Your Submission Phobia is Holding You Back

Tweet
Print
Email
Yes, Your Submission Phobia is Holding You Back

By Michelle Seaton

If you’re feeling discouraged about your work, I guarantee that your number-one problem is this: You aren’t submitting enough. I might not know you, but I know I’m right about this.

In 12 years of teaching at Grub Street, I’ve learned three truths about students:

  1. They don’t submit enough, especially the most talented ones. Read that sentence again and then ask yourself how many times you’ve submitted something in the past year. Yeah, I thought so.
  2. Many of my most talented students never submit anything. This makes me crazy.
  3. The students who publish most often submit constantly, as though it’s their job, or their final year on Earth. And guess what? It works.

I think I know why you don’t submit: It’s easy to become so comfortable in the womb of the supportive workshop or writers’ group that the thought of having a cold eye cast on your work is paralyzing.

Also, we writers are expert liars. Here are the top three lies we tell ourselves.

  • Rejection is all powerful. You think rejection is proof that you have no talent or that the work is no good. Actually, the only thing a rejection proves is that you sent out your work. Good for you. I suggest you collect ten of these and then reward yourself.
  • I will submit this story soon, when it feels finished. No you won’t. For most stories and essays there is no moment when it will feel good enough. Submit before you feel ready. Like, today.
  • I’m afraid that my work will end up in a journal that’s not good enough. Right. Because keeping the work moldering in your hard drive for a few years is a much better fate for it. No one knows how prestigious a journal is or isn’t—except for those at the very top. So stop obsessing.

In my class on submitting essays, I insist on several things. First, that students submit each work to no fewer than 10 journals at once. Twenty is even better. Yes, journal editors hate this advice, so don’t tell any that I said to do this. But this is what you must do.

Someone in class always asks if they should read the journals before submitting to them. The short answer is no.

Should you be reading journals extensively? Yes. Should you subscribe to several? Yes. In fact, if you are a Boston-area writer and you don’t subscribe to one of the many outstanding local lit journals, well, that’s a crime. But right now we’re performing triage on your submission phobia, and the last thing you need is six months’ worth of homework with which you can procrastinate. Go to each journal’s website and look at the work that’s posted. For now, that’s enough. Want a great shortcut to compiling a list of journals to submit to? Visitwww.duotrope.com , which now lists nonfiction markets.

Second, I insist that writers have a boilerplate cover sheet into which they can insert the name of each new story, essay or poem and its length. An ideal cover sheet is short and perfunctory. Why? Because editors don’t read them. Your work speaks for itself.

Finally, I make writers sit down and set a date on the calendar—for this week—when they will submit a particular work.

Are you still reading this article? Stop now and start submitting.

 
 
Michelle Seaton has been an instructor with Grub Street since 2000, teaching such classes as 6 Weeks 6 Essays, Tour of the Essay, and Master Narrative Nonfiction. She is also the lead instructor and created the curriculum for Grub Street’s Memoir Project, a program that offers free memoir classes to senior citizens in Boston neighborhoods. Her nonfiction work has appeared in Yankee, Robb Report, The Pinch, Best American Nonrequired Reading, and on the NPR show, “Only a Game.” Her fiction has appeared in the Sycamore Review and Quiddity International Journal. She is the coauthor of The Way of Boys (William Morrow, 2009).
 

Photo credit: Paolo Margari / Foter / CC BY-NC-ND

Comments

#1 Or...

Posted by Miriam N Conde (not verified) on Dec 03, 2012 at 1:36AM

Then there's always self-publishing. But I'm guessing if you're too afraid to submit to an agent, you'd be deathly afraid to go straight to the public.

  • reply

#2 Great advice and some good

Posted by Julia Kovach (not verified) on Dec 02, 2012 at 10:47AM

Great advice and some good links! Thanks for getting me moving again!

  • reply

#3 This is me to a T...

Posted by plm sagara (not verified) on Nov 29, 2012 at 5:47PM

This is me to a T...

  • reply

#4 Huh? Oh, I'm sorry, I wasn't

Posted by Anonymous (not verified) on Nov 29, 2012 at 5:35PM

Huh? Oh, I'm sorry, I wasn't paying attention because I was too busy looking at the adorable kitty

  • reply

#5 It's who you know

Posted by Lord Patchogue (not verified) on Nov 29, 2012 at 12:32PM

In my opinion, mass submissions such as advocated in this post are a complete waste of time. Nearly always, an unsolicited manuscript will assume its place in the slush pile and the author will be _lucky_ to get a canned rejection slip from the editorial staff. Even if you're the next [insert your literary hero's name here], your work will likely not fit into the issue's hairbrained "theme," or the unqualified editorial reader will have difficulty recognizing the quality of your work because it does not conform to his or her (usually pedestrian) notions concerning prose fiction. Worse yet (paradoxically) is the editor who actually _reads_ your manuscript and says your work is "compelling" and "shows great promise" but who returns it to you anyway asking that you make certain changes so that your work conforms to her or his (usually pedestrian) notions of prose fiction. You desperately rewrite to please, only to hear nothing for months until (if you're lucky) the canned rejection slip arrives. This is what's known as the "long rejection." And this is the experience with middling journals who, if nothing else, will at least _accept_ unsolicited manuscripts to keep the false hope alive. Granta? Conjunctions? Paris Review? It is to laugh.

Far better to build and sustain a network among more established writers and editors. Attend conferences and meet people. Solicit more established writers (many of whom have professional relationships with editors at a number of journals) to read your work. If you've got something good enough, they just might pass it along to one of their editor friends. Or, should you manage to hit it off with an editor, you might send her or him a piece asking that they just read it and offer feedback. Without out pressure to evaluate for publishing, you're getting your work in front of an editor with whom you might develop a deeper professional relationship.

Also, be prepared to strike when ad hoc relationships emerge: I recently placed a piece with a national journal because the journal's editor and I both did interview segments on the same obscure webcast. (We had a connection based on the webcast's subject matter.) We had not previously met. I wrote him and introduced myself, and I noted that I had a piece (a novel excerpt) that might be a good fit for the journal he edits. He told me to send the piece. I did. He liked it. He accepted it. Had I sent the piece cold, I'm sure it would have languished in the slush.

So my advice, in short, is to write, write some more, write even more, build relationships, solicit experience writers and editors in your network to read your work, submit to targeted publications based on the relationships you're developing.

  • reply

#6 Thanks for this. It reminded

Posted by X (not verified) on Nov 28, 2012 at 9:10PM

Thanks for this. It reminded me to keep submitting, keep getting rejection letters. I submitted six pieces as a result.

  • reply

#7 I feel like this blog post is

Posted by Boots (not verified) on Nov 28, 2012 at 7:43PM

I feel like this blog post is speaking directly to me. Supportive, but no nonsense. I'm sitting on a huge pile of work, always tinkering, never letting it go.
Thank you for the tips.

  • reply

#8 Oh my god,

Posted by Abra (not verified) on Nov 28, 2012 at 12:18AM

Oh my god, against-the-guidelines simsubs? I'd never advise that. (But I'm in genre, not essays, and I have so many pieces out at a time that I don't need sims to cover the field. Still: ouch!)

  • reply

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <blockquote> <br> <cite> <code> <dd> <div> <dl> <dt> <em> <li> <ol> <p> <span> <strong> <ul>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <blockquote> <br> <cite> <code> <dd> <div> <dl> <dt> <em> <h4> <h5> <h6> <li> <ol> <p> <pre> <span> <strong> <sub> <sup> <ul>
    Allowed Style properties: text-indent
  • Use to create page breaks.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Find Publishing Tips

More Tips

Out of Africa: Lit Mags Related to Africa and Diaspora
Consider Twitter Fiction
"We Want a Clean, Polished Stories": Guidelines for Editors Writing Submission Guidelines
Mighty Thunder from Down Under: Australian Lit Mags and Literary Resources
A List of Writerly Don'ts
Dear Literary Insider: Agents, Lit Mags, and Submitting
Entering Lit Mag Contests: The Fine Print
Submission Fees: What are They Good For?
The New Yorker Rejects Itself: A Quasi-Scientific Analysis of Slush Piles
Good Literary Citizenship: When Rejection Leads to Acceptance
  •  
  • 1 of 13
  • ››